Greed, Grievance, and Mobilization THE ONSET OF PROTEST, REBELLION, AND CIVIL WAR
نویسندگان
چکیده
Greed, grievances, and mobilization are generally offered as explanations for rebellion and civil war. The authors extend arguments about the precursors to nonviolent protest, violent rebellion, and civil war. These arguments motivate a series of hypotheses that are tested against data from the Minorities at Risk project. The results of the analysis suggest, first, that the factors that predict antistate activity at one level of violence do not always hold at other levels; second, the response by the state has a large impact on the subsequent behavior of the rebels; and third, the popular notion of diamonds fueling civil unrest is generally not supported. The authors draw inferences from their results to future theoretical and policy development.
منابع مشابه
Greed and Grievance
Of the 27 major armed conflicts that occurred in in Civil W ar 1999, all but two took place within national boundaries. Anke Hoe ffler development, internal rebellion especially hurts the world's poorest countries.
متن کاملEthnic Inequality and Civil War SURJ
65 Conventional wisdom suggests ethnic inequality predicts civil war onset. Stewart suggests that when individual selfesteem is bound up with ethnic identity, ethnic inequality produces grievances that lead to mobilization and civil war. However, recent cross-national studies have been inconclusive due to methodological problems (Fearon J & Laitin D, working paper presented at APSA 1999). Altho...
متن کاملGrievance, Commodity Prices and Rainfall: A Village-level Analysis of Rebel Recruitment in Burundi
Grievance and reduced opportunity costs are two popular ideas within the civil war literature to explain participation in violent rebellion. We test both hypotheses at the village-level using data on recruitment activities during the civil war in Burundi. We use historical data on violent attacks in 1972 and 1988 as a proxy for grievance. The cross-sectional analyses report no effect of grievan...
متن کاملWho Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War
A range of seemingly rival theories attempts to explain why some individuals take extraordinary risks by choosing to participate in armed conflict. To date, however, competing accounts have typically not been grounded in systematic, empirical studies of the determinants of participation. In this paper, we begin to fill this gap through an examination of the determinants of participation in insu...
متن کاملChad Outline
The model not only underpredicts civil war onsets, but it also had inconsistent success in its point predictions. It points to 1960-61 as the years Chad was most vulnerable to a civil war (over six percent probability for each of these years). Yet the first civil was onset was not until 1965 when the odds were a bit over one percent, about two-thirds the world average. Although the model does n...
متن کامل